O’Really O’Reilly

O’Really Reactor TO O’Reilly Male-Factor
mp3 audio of this post by the author

With approximately three weeks before the Nov. 4, 2008 elections the vociferous polls say Obama is about ten points ahead of McInane. Maybe. Maybe not. Who is left except for the same one who does not know the obese bat in the McInane asylum rally who said she was worried Obama was an arab, WHO was a shill, betcha dollar to a couple dozen doughnuts.

That one would not know the malefactoring media muck maker is kneading the dough of the poll bisquits to make them rise right on time. And then deflate ever so much for the ahhhhhh reaction.

So, assume the McInane team is not worried. The F Factor will offset the points Obama leads by easily.

F factor? F for fraudulent election handling somewhat as Greg Palast outlined in his depiction of the 2008 fraud work on hearthevoices.com. Perhaps even Greg forgot to remember how exonerating is the practice of the crook calling everyone else a crook. But, ooooooohhhhh doesn’t that ooze over into media muck making magic.

So here is the idea that I have been rolling around a week or more and enough to think it is worth pitching to some TV network that is really “the place for [honest news on] politics.” MSNBC is about the only one that fits the bill and that is mainly at night. And OK, to be honest, I am hooked on Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann.

Wellllllllllllll, it ain’tttttttttttt Fox News. That’s for sure.

And if MSNBC and Rachel won’t go for it, dear bleader, and Keith Olberman declines, I will just continue to do it here.

But frankly, I think this could drive the MSNBC ratings through the roof, drive Fox out of business, overwhelm the F factor sufficiently to allow us all to know that in three weeks that cool, calm, collected mulatto marvel will be assured the tiller of the ship of state.

I want all the blog readers, to get into this long enough to get hooked on debunking muck raking, dishonest journalism.

So this first episode goes as follows and if you get the non-pic/non-audio version, check back later tonight when it will have both.

O’Reilly is reading aloud his magnum dopus, The O’Reilly Factor.

O’Really is reading his own annotations of the magnum dopus, which annotation he will publish as the O’Really Factor.

O’Reilly: [quoting from a letter] … ‘A thoughtful, deliberative person does not stand a chance with you.’ … one letter selected at random. They come in bushels everyday. … Something about me and my nightly program … drives some people up the wall.”

O’Really: Gee, O’Reilly. While still in the first paragraph of the intro of your book you are manipulating cheap rhetoric tricks and logical fallacies. A three banger in the first paragraph:

1. twisting the reference
a. “a thoughtful deliberate person does not stand a chance with you”
becomes
b. O’Reilly suggests his show “drives people up the wall” especially thoughtful deliberate people
2. turns a soft criticism into ‘look how great I am’ because I can handle “thoughtful deliberate people.”
3. O’Reilly says “I’m used to it. I didn’t even have to have the top-rated cable news program to get the same response from my first-grade teacher. … I was controversial in the first grade. I come by it honestly”

O’Reilly: The first grade Think and Do book. “I have always had a thing about lies, lying, and liars — and this book was pure propaganda. The illustration of kids smiling while doing math problems was a major lie. I knew that at six years old.”

O’Really: My dear O’Reilly. You construed the Think and Do book was a major lie because the cover illustration showed kids smiling while doing math.
a. It would be a lie to you because in the cultural milieu of your youth, perhaps no one could imagine kids smiling while doing math.
b. It would be perfectly natural for kids to be smiling while doing math if their culture encouraged a desire, a joy, and a responsibility to do homework. Here are some cultures I am familiar with and most I have lived in wherein the children might want to do homework and might be smiling while doing it.

• Jewish families in the US.
• Minnesota families in the US and other areas in the US of high quality education.
• European families, especially German, Scandinavian, and in the low countries (Netherlands etc.).
• But, perhaps most importantly would be Muslim cultures, particularly in Iran. And do not forget, the Hindu-Arab Decimal Numeral system was a legacy to European cultures by the Arab cultures.

c. So, dear O’Reilly, the outstanding sentence in the first page of your introduction says

• you dislike lies and then ignorantly, you directly accuse the writers and publishers of your first grade math book of lying by illustrating children smiling while doing math
• Indirectly, you accuse your first grade teacher of being a liar because she tried to teach you math.
• But your greatest crime against humanity on your first page is
  • you suggest that it is good for citizens of the US to hate math and
  • define liars as those who try to teach US children math

d. It seems fitting to think of the Think and Do cover’s children as smiling at the village idiot who will become a first class liar but certainly would never have the love of truth required to become a mathmatician, any kind of physical scientist, architect, engineer, medical researcher or practicioner and on and on and on.

Essentially, you are just one of those name callers who would refer to a studious child as a nerd.

Reference:
Hindu-Arab Decimal Numeral System

– be well,
jack luna MOTH